TransitGlide

Location:HOME > Transportation > content

Transportation

Comparing Metro Trains and Stations: Insights from India and Abroad

November 11, 2025Transportation2508
Comparing Metro Trains and Stations: Insights from India and Abroad Me

Comparing Metro Trains and Stations: Insights from India and Abroad

Metro trains and stations are essential components of urban transportation systems, designed to cater to the needs of millions of passengers each day. However, the implementation and operational protocols vary significantly from one country to another. In this article, we will explore the differences and unique features of metro trains and stations in India compared to those found in other countries around the world.

Overview of Metro Trains and Stations

Metro systems are renowned for their efficiency, reliability, and capacity to transport large numbers of passengers. While the core principle of providing swift and convenient transit remains constant, the specific technologies, security measures, and operating models differ based on regional practices and challenges.

Unique Features of Metro Trains and Stations Abroad

Japan's Overhead Monorail System

Monorail Mechanism: Japan is known for its innovative monorail systems, which operate on a single rail track. This design allows for a smoother and quieter ride, making it a popular choice in urban areas. The monorail systems in Japan utilize compartment motors, rather than a single motor per side, ensuring a more efficient and reliable operation.

Battery Backup: In case of a power outage, each compartment is equipped with a battery backup system. This feature ensures that the train can continue its journey safely until it reaches a powered section of the track. Additionally, the train is designed to prevent passengers from exiting if any mishap occurs in transit, ensuring safety and control.

Secured Boarding and Operations

Security Measures: Advanced security measures are a hallmark of metro systems in many countries. In Japan, for instance, passengers must swipe their tickets in gates to enter the station, and they cannot board or disembark from the train without valid credentials. This system ensures that only authorized individuals can access the platforms and trains, preventing unauthorized entry and maintaining order.

DC System in Metro Operations

DC System: Many metro systems, including those in Japan, operate on a direct current (DC) system. This system features a no-entry zone along the tracks and their immediate surroundings, as there is always an electrical current flowing through them. Notably, these systems have safety protocols in place to prevent people from walking or even approaching the tracks, as it poses significant risks of injury or electrical shock.

India's Metro Trains and Stations

India's metro systems, while equally efficient, face unique challenges and operate under different principles compared to those in other countries. One of the most significant differences lies in the payment system and behavior of vendors and beggars.

No-Fare Policy: Unlike many metro systems abroad, Indian metro stations often operate on a no-fare policy. Passengers can board trains without purchasing tickets, leading to a unique set of challenges. This lack of fare control results in significant losses due to unauthorized boarding, phenomena observed in cities like New Delhi, which face more than Rs. 20 million in losses daily.

Vendor and Beggar Behavior: In India, it is common to see vendors and beggars boarding the trains without tickets. These individuals often provide a free service to passengers, engaging in casual interactions and sometimes even facilitating moves along the route. This practice raises ethical and legal concerns, as it leads to substantial revenue loss for the metro systems.

Comparable Practices Abroad

In contrast, metro systems in other countries typically operate under strict ticketing policies. For instance, in the United States and Europe, vendors and beggars are not tolerated on public transit systems. Stations are manned by security personnel who ensure that only ticketed passengers board the trains. This approach helps maintain financial sustainability and operational efficiency.

Conclusion

The differences in metro train and station implementations across countries highlight the diverse challenges and solutions in urban transportation systems. While India's no-fare policy and the presence of vendors and beggars present unique issues, these differences also offer opportunities for innovation and improvement. By learning from the practices and technologies used in other countries, India's metro systems can continue to evolve and provide better services to its citizens and visitors.