TransitGlide

Location:HOME > Transportation > content

Transportation

Highway vs Stop-and-Go Traffic: Which is More Fuel-Efficient?

September 18, 2025Transportation2252
Highway vs Stop-and-Go Traffic: Which is More Fuel-Efficient? When it

Highway vs Stop-and-Go Traffic: Which is More Fuel-Efficient?

When it comes to fuel efficiency, many drivers wonder whether driving on the highway or in stop-and-go traffic uses more gas. In this article, we'll explore the factors that influence fuel consumption and provide insights to help you make informed decisions for your next journey.

Understanding Fuel Efficiency on the Highway

The conventional wisdom often suggests that driving on the highway uses more gas, but recent studies and real-world driving experiences challenge this notion. At a steady pace, around 60-65 km/h (37-40 mph), drivers can achieve optimal fuel efficiency. The key difference lies in wind resistance and the engine's power requirements.

Wind Resistance: When driving on the highway, the vehicle maintains a constant speed, which means the engine primarily needs to overcome aerodynamic drag and other resistances once it reaches the desired speed. This is in contrast to stop-and-go traffic, where the engine must frequently generate more power to stop and start repeatedly, leading to higher fuel consumption.

According to many drivers, steady, smooth driving at 90-110 km/h (56-68 mph) still uses less gas than the same vehicle. However, experienced drivers often report that driving at around 60 km/h (37 mph) provides the best fuel efficiency, mainly due to the reduction in wind resistance.

The Role of Engine Load and Fuel Consumption

Engine load plays a significant role in fuel consumption. When driving at a steady speed, the engine operates more efficiently, as it is only required to maintain that speed. In stop-and-go traffic, the engine must frequently vary its power output, causing it to work harder and consume more fuel.

For example, consider a modern car with an automatic engine shutoff feature. These vehicles can achieve better mileage in city traffic due to the frequent stop-and-go nature, but when driven at 75 km/h (47 mph) or 840-mile round-trip journeys, the optimal speed drops to around 70 km/h (43 mph) to maintain efficiency.

Comparing Distance and Time

When discussing fuel efficiency, it is important to consider both distance and time. While stop-and-go traffic may be more fuel-efficient over a short period, the total distance traveled is a crucial factor.

When driving on the highway, a car typically achieves higher fuel efficiency over long distances. This is why many vehicles are advertised with a cToFront-of combined mileage figure, often ranging from 25-30 miles per gallon (mpg). By driving at a consistent speed, the engine operates efficiently, leading to better fuel economy.

However, when driving per hour, highway driving may consume more fuel. For instance, if a car gets 25 mpg in the city, it might only manage 25 miles per hour, consuming 1 gallon of fuel. In contrast, a car that gets 30 mpg on the highway might travel 60 miles in one hour, burning 2 gallons of fuel. While this seems counterintuitive, the higher fuel consumption per hour on the highway is offset by the greater distance covered.

Modern Vehicles and Fuel Efficiency

Modern cars, particularly those with advanced engine management systems and automatic shutoff features, have significantly improved fuel efficiency. These features help reduce fuel consumption by minimizing power output during idle periods.

For instance, a car that uses modern technology and drives at 70 km/h (43 mph) can achieve better fuel efficiency in the long run, even if the mileage per gallon appears lower per hour. The key is to find the optimal balance between speed and fuel consumption while considering the overall distance you plan to travel.

Conclusion: In general, driving on the highway is more fuel-efficient for long distances, primarily due to reduced wind resistance and a more consistent power output. However, when comparing per hour, stop-and-go traffic can consume more fuel despite shorter distances.

Related Keywords: fuel efficiency, highway driving, stop-and-go traffic, car engine, wind resistance