Libertarians and Monarchy: A Critical Examination of Constitutional Desires

The debate over whether libertarians favor a monarchy over democracy is a complex and multifaceted issue, often rooted in philosophical and practical considerations. In this essay, we will explore the concerns and perspectives of libertarians regarding constitutional monarchy and democratic governance, emphasizing the importance of a balanced and rights-respecting system.

Freedom and Constitutional Monarchy

Many libertarians, especially those who advocate for a constitutional monarchy, argue that monarchies can offer certain advantages in terms of governance. A constitutional monarchy, with a constitution that protects private property rights and economic liberty, can be an effective framework for ensuring individual freedoms.

Historically, monarchies have often been better at countering populist movements and the often corrupt politicians who lead them. Populism frequently leads to financial instability, and as such, a constitutional monarchy can play a role in maintaining fiscal health. A monarch who understands the importance of their role and prioritizes the freedom of association would likely be well-regarded by libertarians.

Libertarianism and Democratic Governance

However, it is important to note that most libertarians do favor a democratic form of government, albeit with significant reservations. They argue that democracy should not be equated with the control of private citizens by the government. Voting to economically control private citizens is not democracy; it is more accurately described as a form of tyranny or slavery.

Libertarians believe in self-ownership, the non-aggression principle, and the right to be left alone. They argue that pure democracy can eventually lead to the tyranny of the majority, where the interests of the majority can dominate and oppress the minority. This was a key concern expressed by figures like John Adams, who warned about the dangers of democracy.

Critical Perspectives on Monarchy and Democracy

The question of whether those who favor personal liberty over statist power prefer a monarchy is a misinformed one. Libertarian perspectives on governance are nuanced and not limited to a binary choice between monarchy and democracy. Many libertarians, including myself, identify with a form of constitutional federal republicanism.

My advocacy for a government based on constitutional federal republicanism is grounded in the belief that the federal government should be restricted to specific, enumerated roles such as war, diplomacy, coining money, and ensuring national security. State governments should be free to pursue a broader array of policies, so long as they do not interfere with federal matters or infringe upon individual rights, which are protected by a codified Bill of Rights.

Conclusion: A Balanced Perspective

The most important consideration for libertarians is a government that respects individual rights, promotes economic freedom, and operates within clearly defined constitutional limits. Whether this takes the form of a constitutional monarchy or a democratic republic is secondary to the fundamental principles that underpin a free society.

Ultimately, the focus should be on a system that ensures individual liberty, private property rights, and a government that serves the people rather than controlling them. This nuanced approach allows for a more inclusive and effective form of governance that aligns with libertarian ideals.