The Cost of Urban Development: A Critique of Maharashtra’s Metro Car Shed Transfer Decision

Life, particularly political life, is often characterized by indecent compromises. The Maharashtra government’s decision to shift the metro car shed from Aarey to Kanjurmarg is the latest example of such a compromise, likely leading to more such decisions in the future until the common man addresses Chief Minister Fadnavis as Chief Minister instead of Deputy Chief Minister.

Protecting the Breatheable Lungs of Mumbai

Aarey is a significant green area that feels like a forest, a symbol of the green cover that Mumbai once had. It has been declared a forest area, thanks to the efforts of the Maharashtra government. However, is it wise to convert these lungs of Mumbai into a source of pollution, akin to Delhi? A quick Google search will reveal the current state of the Aarey colony.

The cutting of trees in Aarey was carried out at night, accompanied by police brutality against peaceful protestors. The thought that a necessary development should come at the cost of natural green spaces and the health of the citizens is shocking. The government's decision to shift the car shed seems more like a political move than a practical solution.

Pollution and Development: A Compromise We Can Avoid

Kanjurmarg, the proposed new site, is already heavily polluted, with numerous industries and heavy traffic. While the pollution levels may be a lesser concern here compared to shifting to Aarey, this move brings its own set of challenges. Additional INR 23,000 crore is required for the Kanjurmarg site, increasing the cost and delaying the project. These extra funds could be better spent improving existing infrastructure rather than shifting to a more polluted area.

Moreover, the relocation raises questions about whose interests are being served. The government claims the shift is necessary, but if the Supreme Court has already rejected the plea for relocation, what is the rationale behind the decision? The development at the cost of health is unwise. It is time to prioritize public health and the environment.

Questioning the Government’s Motives

The construction of the Aarey car shed already involved the cutting of trees and the displacement of protesters. If a new car shed is required elsewhere, why is the government now choosing to shift the shed after cutting these trees? If the Supreme Court has already rejected the plea for relocation, why is the government still proceeding with the decision? The Kanjurmarg site is far from ideal, with its high costs and potential for further delay.

Furthermore, who will bear the cost of the INR 100 crore already invested in the Aarey shed? This money could be put to better use if the project were allowed to proceed with modifications to minimize environmental impact. Mumbaikars are already waiting for a sophisticated transport system. How long must they wait for a decision that prioritizes short-term political gains over long-term community well-being?

Conclusion: Prioritizing People and the Planet

The decision to shift the metro car shed from Aarey to Kanjurmarg is a case study in reckless urban development. Prioritizing short-term political gains over the long-term health and well-being of the citizens is not a sustainable approach. Instead, the government should focus on developing solutions that balance urban growth with environmental preservation and public health. This will ensure a better future for all Mumbaikars.