The Risks of FAA Approval After Another 737 MAX Crash

The approval of the Boeing 737 MAX by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in the wake of past crashes has raised significant questions about the safety protocols and regulatory oversight. If the aircraft were to crash again, would Boeing face irreparable damage, or would the FAA's credibility be severely compromised?

Risk of Recurring Crashes

Previous incidents involving the 737 MAX led to fatal crashes. The FAA's decision to not ground the aircraft in the aftermath of these incidents reflects a regulatory approach that may have compromised public trust. The aircraft’s safety issues eventually led to the necessary corrective measures, but the initial response sparked concerns about oversight and regulation.

The most recent crash of a MAX8 highlighted the ongoing risks. Despite the FAA not grounding the aircraft, multiple countries did take action, underscoring a growing divide between domestic and international safety standards. This scenario raises the question of how effective the FAA's oversight is on the global stage.

Global Perspectives and Criticisms

On an international scale, the FAA and NTSB have been subject to criticism. Other nations have not relied on these organizations for their primary investigative and corrective efforts, opting instead to take more decisive action. The suggestion that the FAA and NTSB have become a laughingstock on the global stage reflects a broader perception of regulatory failings.

However, the exact impact of another crash would depend on the circumstances. If a recurrence is due to pilot or ATC error, or other latent issues, the consequences could be severe. Grounding of all MAX aircraft would likely be required for a thorough investigation and to restore public confidence.

Consequences of Another Crash

If the 737 MAX were to crash again for the same apparent reason, the broader implications could be profound. Boeing would likely need to conduct a comprehensive investigation and potentially ground the affected aircraft. Depending on the extent of the issue, software updates or hardware modifications may be required. Currently, 387 aircraft have been delivered, with 266 located outside the USA, requiring complex logistics to address any necessary modifications.

The type certificate or airworthiness certificate would remain in place to avoid the cost and logistics of scrapping the aircraft. However, Boeing would face significant scrutiny and criticism. The impact on company reputation and market trust could be substantial, potentially leading to decreased orders and longer-term financial setbacks.

Conclusion

The approval of the 737 MAX by the FAA in the wake of past crashes has left many questioning the regulatory body's effectiveness. Another crash would likely lead to a swift and comprehensive response by Boeing, but the long-term impact on the company and the FAA's credibility cannot be overstated. International actors have already shown willingness to take decisive action, demonstrating a growing gap in safety standards.

The findings and actions taken following another crash will be crucial in determining the future of the 737 MAX and the integrity of aviation regulatory bodies.