Introduction

The frequent claims by the United States that Iran is attacking ships in the Strait of Hormuz and the subsequent lack of military response have raised several questions and suspicions. To understand the underlying motives and actions, it is crucial to delve into the historical context and the complex geopolitical relationships at play. This article explores the potential motivations behind these claims and the broader implications for peace and stability in the region.

Provocation and Underlying Motives

The United States has consistently engaged in actions aimed at provoking Iran, primarily to please Israel rather than the American public. This provocation includes both harassment and illegal economic sanctions, which are viewed as genocidal in nature and meant to starve the Iranian people. Such actions have put pressure on the Iranian leadership, leading them to threaten to close the Strait of Hormuz, a critical maritime passage for global oil trade. However, many critics argue that these threats are not genuine and that the motivations behind them are understandable.

False Flag Operations and Israel's Involvement

There is growing suspicion that recent alleged attacks in the region could be part of a widespread false flag operation orchestrated by various entities, particularly the Mossad and the CIA. Israel has a long history of trying to convince the United States to attack Iran, and has been supplying false intelligence to support these claims. An attack on US forces in the region would be highly foolhardy and self-defeating, yet it is suggested that Israel might deliberately plan such incidents to trigger a US military response.

Israel's Agenda and US Involvement

The underlying intention of both Israel and the United States in these actions is to ensure that any conflict or violence is waged on the United States' financial and human cost. This is particularly noteworthy given Israel's preference to avoid direct confrontation with powerful states like Iran that can retaliate. By pushing the US to attack, Israel retains control over the strategic and military narrative and benefits from an external conflict without direct responsibility.

The phrase "puppet master and puppet" aptly describes the relationship between Israel and the United States. Advocates of this viewpoint argue that these nations use the United States as a tool to pursue their own aggressive foreign policies, often at the expense of US citizens. The use of fake media and the historical cover-up of 9/11 are cited as examples of deceptive practices by both countries to maintain control and instigate conflicts deemed necessary by elites.

Conclusion and Call for Caution

The United States must proceed with caution when responding to any alleged attacks by Iran in the Strait of Hormuz. It is imperative for the global community, especially in the United States, to be skeptical of any claims before a thorough investigation is completed. A rapid push for conflict, without robust evidence and a full investigation, could lead to significant and avoidable humanitarian and economic consequences. The international community should urge for transparency and a thorough examination of any allegations before taking any military action.