Why Russia Avoids Certain Aerial Bombardment Strategies: A Deeper Look

In the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, a central question arises: why doesn't Russia resort to certain tactical actions, such as extensive aerial bombings, that it has used in other conflicts around the world? This article delves into the nuances of Russian military tactics, regional differences, and the underlying reasons for avoiding certain strategies.

Media and Public Perception

The Western media often portrays Russia as an aggressor, but from Russia's perspective, they are liberators striving to protect Russians from the anti-Russian regime in Ukraine. This ideological stance significantly influences their military approach, often dictated by a need to minimize collateral damage and civilian casualties.

Comparative Analysis with Other Conflicts

When contrasting Russia's current tactics with its actions in other conflicts, such as the 2008 Georgian invasion and the Syria campaign from 2012 to 2015, the methods used are notably different. In the earlier instances, Russia was more willing to carry out extensive aerial bombings, often leading to significant civilian casualties. These actions seemed to lack the moral and humanitarian considerations that have been evident in the current Russia-Ukraine conflict.

Why Russia Hesitates

The Russian military strategy in Ukraine can be attributed to several factors:

Conscientious Objection: Unlike volunteer armies, where soldiers often have a greater sense of detachment from civilians, Russia's conscript army consists of ordinary citizens, many of whom are young and possibly fathers or brothers of other young men. This connection can significantly affect their willingness to inflict civilian harm. Historical Norms: Russia has historically used scorched earth tactics in retreat, but not during deliberate military operations to maintain strategic advantages and reduce the appearance of wanton destruction. Moral Considerations: Russian forces have attempted to minimize damage to civilian infrastructure, a choice that draws criticism but also reflects a commitment to protecting civilian life.

Symbolism and Public Perception

Understanding why Russia avoids certain bombing strategies is also crucial when considering the broader implications for public perception and international relations. The current approach, while criticized for its potential human cost, is seen as a reflection of Russia's desire to present itself as a more humane actor in the global stage. This strategy, whether effective or not, is deeply rooted in the cultural and historical context of Russian military operations.

The Tragedy of Putin's Vanity Project

Analysts argue that the invasion of Ukraine is Putin's vanity project, fueled by ambitions that have led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Russian soldiers, most of them conscripted. While it is likely that Putin is not delusional, the surrounding circle of sycophants who cater to his narcissistic fantasies plays a significant role. This consolidation of power and validation through a monumental military effort is deeply personal and crucial for Putin's legacy.

Conclusion

The Russian military's approach to aerial bombardment in the Ukraine conflict is complex and multifaceted, shaped by ideological, moral, and strategic considerations. While the absence of extensive aerial bombings may be criticized, it also reflects Russia's attempt to portray itself as a nuanced and less destructive actor on the global stage.