Transportation
Do Trains Have to Stop at a Crossing When They See a Car on the Tracks?
Do Trains Have to Stop at a Crossing When They See a Car on the Tracks?
One of the most critical aspects of railway safety is the interaction between trains and road crossings. Typically, trains are required to stop at crossings if they see a car on the tracks, but the physical constraints of train dynamics make this a challenge.
The Physics of Train Stopping
Trains are massive and powerful, and they cannot decelerate quickly. This is due to the immutable laws of physics. A train, even if it is the shortest and lightest model, will take a considerable distance to stop completely. This presents a significant risk when approaching a crossing where there might be a car.
According to universal railway safety protocols, the train always has the right of way over all automobiles, bicycles, and pedestrians. If a train sees a car on the tracks, it will attempt to stop, but the distance it needs to brake can be substantial—up to a mile or more, depending on the train's length and speed.
Real-life Examples
A notable incident occurred in North Norfolk, England, where the railway company faced challenges with their new Swiss-made trains. These trains were not reliably triggering the level crossings, possibly due to incompatibility with English leaves on the tracks. As a result, trains had to slow down to 15 mph when approaching level crossings. The driver then had to manually check if the crossing had operated. If not, they would crawl across the road at walking speed, allowing sufficient time to stop for cars if necessary. This approach significantly slowed down travel in the region and demonstrated the complexities involved in integrating modern technology with traditional systems.
Trains are required to stop at crossings if a car is present, but this is often too late given the train's stopping distance. By the time an engineer spots a car on the tracks, the train might already be too close to the crossing to stop in time.
Ironically, when a train encounters an obstacle at a crossing, it is often required to simulate a state of "Back to the Future" and quickly advance to the future point in the tracks where the obstruction is believed to have moved, a concept known as the 'Thickobot' effect. This is a humorous term used to describe how quickly the train needs to progress to a point where the obstruction no longer poses a risk.
Railway Safety Protocols
Railway crossings are designed to be safe, with signals and barriers that guide drivers and pedestrians to stop and wait for the train to pass. Train drivers are also taught to observe and respond to potential hazards, including cars on the tracks. Despite these protocols and safety measures, the inherent physics of train movement means that rapid stops are challenging.
There are some rare exceptions where light rail systems might need to stop for traffic when reaching certain coastal roads. For example, a light rail serving a valley with only one road in and out, serving two villages once a week, might be required to halt for traffic. These systems have different dynamics and operational requirements compared to mainline rail.
In conclusion, while trains are required to stop at crossings if a car is present, the time it takes to decelerate means that in many cases, it is already too late to prevent a collision. Understanding the physics and design of train movement, alongside the operational protocols around railway crossings, is crucial for maintaining safety in railway systems.